Registration Links (4 Options)
ONC-ORG

Clinical Trials

Search trials funded by the NIH, NCI and pharmaceutical sponsors — or let a navigator match you.

Not sure which trial fits? A navigator will search for you at no cost.Get Matched
NCT06704191Phase 1, Phase 2Recruiting

In-home Intravesical Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Bladder Cancer, INVITE Trial

Mayo Clinic · Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, Florida

This phase Ib/II trial compares the safety, tolerability and acceptability of intravesical chemotherapy given at home to in-clinic administration in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Chemotherapy drugs, such as bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG), gemcitabine, docetaxel, and mitomycin C, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Standard of care chemotherapy for non-invasive bladder cancer is usually given directly into the bladder through a catheter (intravesical). This process requires numerous visits and can be disruptive to the lives of patients and caregivers. Bringing cancer care to the patients with in-home intravesical therapy may help reduce the disruption to daily lives. In-home intravesical chemotherapy may be safe and tolerable and may also be preferable to in-clinic administration in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Eligibility: 18 Years to · All · * PHASE IB ONLY: Female or male patients with histologically confirmed non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (stage Ta, Tis, or T1) who are currently receiving induction therapy with one of the following eligible intravesical treatment regimens * Gemcitabine * Sequential gemcitabine/docetaxel * Bacillus Calmette-Guerin * Mitomycin C * PHASE II ONLY: Female or male patients with histologically confirmed non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (stage Ta, Tis or T1) who are receiving maintenance therapy with an eligible regimen * PHASE IB ONLY: Able to be successfully catheterized and able to tolerate first dost of intravesical therapy in the outpatient clinic * Residing within the area serviced by supplier network * Residence either has Wi-Fi or cellular data network connection for virtual telehealth visits * Age ≥ 18 years at time of registration * Signed informed consent form by patient * Willing and able to comply with the study protocol in the investigator's judgment * Ability to complete questionnaire(s) by themselves or with assistance * Willingness to follow birth control requirements for females and males of reproductive potential

NCT06929286Phase 3Recruiting

A Study Comparing Standard Treatments in People With Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC)

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · Johns Hopkins University (Data Collection Only), Baltimore, Maryland

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of different FDA-approved/NCCN-recommended drug treatments for NMIBC. In particular, the FDA-approved drug nadofaragene firadenovec will be compared to usual care with other NCCN-recommended standard treatments for NMIBC (gemcitabine with or without docetaxel, mitomycin, re-treatment with BCG, or pembrolizumab).

Eligibility: 21 Years to · All · * 21 years of age or older * Being treated for high-grade NMIBC (Tis, Ta, or T1) under the care of the participating treating urologists * One or more prior induction course of BCG at any point in time and judgment by the treating urologist that BCG has failed °Any amount of maintenance BCG is allowed * In the previous 12 months, receipt of at least one instillation of any intravesical agent (induction or maintenance) or one administration of systemic therapy for NMIBC treatment * An intravesical agent can include BCG or any other NMIBC treatment * Up to 15 months from the last instillation is allowed for the treating physician to perform a transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) so long as there is evidence/suspicion of recurrent disease (by urinary cytology, imaging, or cystoscopy) within 12 months of last exposure to an intravesical agent. * In the opinion of the treating urologist, there is no contraindication to treatment with nadofaragene firadenovec (i.e. hypersensitivity to IFNa, severe immunosuppression) and there is uncertainty over whether nadofaragene is better than "best usual care"